sandbaggers: Re: Who's more moral?

Re: Who's more moral?

Gayle Feyrer (rca@netcom.com)
Tue, 19 Sep 1995 08:44:00 -0700 (PDT)

On Tue, 19 Sep 1995, Kenneth W. Crist Jr. wrote:

> Whereas, Wellingham will write off a subordinate for political
> expediency. He only agreed to sign the paper in "Special Relationship"
> because of Neil, not because Wellingham cared what happened to Laura.
> She was expendible.
> Agents are expendible to Neil when their loss will accomplish
> some good. They are expendible to Wellingham when they are a liability.

You might be right - but you might not. Wellingham is capable of
personal loyalty. He might very well have done his best to protect his
own agents. Neil's agents are not his own. But he is a political animal
more than Neil.

Gayle