Certainly this was a new low even for him however his point that he
needed him more than she did was somewhat persuasive. His methods are
unconscionable yet correct in objective logic.
--WebTV-Mail-1058744249-2314
Content-Type: MESSAGE/RFC822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
X-Authentication-Warning: tanith.skylee.com: majordom set sender to
owner-sandbaggers@skylee.com using -f
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 07:49:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Gayle Feyrer <agile@crl.com>
To: sandbaggers@skylee.com
Subject: Disapprove?
In-Reply-To: <199803130310.TAA02854@mailtod-131.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980313074055.27953B-100000@crl8.crl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-sandbaggers@skylee.com
Precedence: bulk
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998, mitch cunningham wrote:
> Question: Does anyone seriously disapprove of Burnsides methods in
> opposing Communism, with the exception of the last episode where he
I seriously disapprove of Burnside's methods in general. The
botched machinations that end in the destruction of Alan Denson and his
girlfriend being an excellent case in point. The whole scenairo is
worthy of the KGB.
Gayle
--WebTV-Mail-1058744249-2314--